<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Other Half of History</title>
	<atom:link href="http://historyhalf.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://historyhalf.com</link>
	<description>American History They Don&#039;t Teach in College</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:36:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Slavery and American Capitalism by Judy</title>
		<link>http://historyhalf.com/slavery-and-american-capitalism/comment-page-1/#comment-7103</link>
		<dc:creator>Judy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Jan 2012 04:36:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historyhalf.com/?p=480#comment-7103</guid>
		<description>I was going to comment on this column until I checked out your link to another of your columns here:

http://historyhalf.com/american-capitalism-the-engine-of-progress/


Where you say: 


&quot;The human race did very little to improve standards of living during the four or five thousand years of recorded history leading up to 1776.&quot;


I would take what you have to say much more seriously if you hadn&#039;t posited that the human race accomplished very little in the 5000 years or so prior to the the American Declaration of Independence, our Revolution, and our exercises in capitalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was going to comment on this column until I checked out your link to another of your columns here:</p>
<p><a href="http://historyhalf.com/american-capitalism-the-engine-of-progress/" rel="nofollow">http://historyhalf.com/american-capitalism-the-engine-of-progress/</a></p>
<p>Where you say: </p>
<p>&#8220;The human race did very little to improve standards of living during the four or five thousand years of recorded history leading up to 1776.&#8221;</p>
<p>I would take what you have to say much more seriously if you hadn&#8217;t posited that the human race accomplished very little in the 5000 years or so prior to the the American Declaration of Independence, our Revolution, and our exercises in capitalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media Lies about Romney&#8217;s Taxes by Al Fuller</title>
		<link>http://historyhalf.com/media-lies-about-romneys-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6908</link>
		<dc:creator>Al Fuller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 21:15:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historyhalf.com/?p=2346#comment-6908</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the question Freddie. I&#039;ll run some numbers and post them soon.

Al Fuller</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the question Freddie. I&#8217;ll run some numbers and post them soon.</p>
<p>Al Fuller</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Media Lies about Romney&#8217;s Taxes by Freddie</title>
		<link>http://historyhalf.com/media-lies-about-romneys-taxes/comment-page-1/#comment-6906</link>
		<dc:creator>Freddie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Jan 2012 19:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historyhalf.com/?p=2346#comment-6906</guid>
		<description>Fuller accuses the media of &quot;lying&quot; when they say that most middle class pay more than 15%, but he doesn&#039;t prove his point. 

I get the point about low income people getting tax credits, but I wonder how  much you have to earn to pay more than 15%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fuller accuses the media of &#8220;lying&#8221; when they say that most middle class pay more than 15%, but he doesn&#8217;t prove his point. </p>
<p>I get the point about low income people getting tax credits, but I wonder how  much you have to earn to pay more than 15%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Supreme Court Upholds Churchs&#8217; Rights by Proton</title>
		<link>http://historyhalf.com/supreme-court-upholds-churchs-rights/comment-page-1/#comment-6886</link>
		<dc:creator>Proton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2012 07:45:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historyhalf.com/?p=2309#comment-6886</guid>
		<description>Post piqued my curiosity. More details about the case itself would have been helpful and interesting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post piqued my curiosity. More details about the case itself would have been helpful and interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Academia and The Second Amendment by David E. Young</title>
		<link>http://historyhalf.com/academia-and-the-second-amendment/comment-page-1/#comment-6726</link>
		<dc:creator>David E. Young</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jan 2012 18:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://historyhalf.com/?p=653#comment-6726</guid>
		<description>The brief filed by professional academic historians in the Washington DC vs Heller case contained an amazing number of historical errors and extensive omissions of essential information. These errors and omissions have been documented at ON SECOND OPINION BLOG in  a 24 part series, Root Causes of Never-Ending Second Amendment Dispute, which commenced on January 25, 2009.

The most recent Second Amendment article directly contradicting the academic historians is The American Revolutionary Era Origin of the Second Amendment&#039;s Clauses, which was published in the JOURNAL ON FIREARMS &amp; PUBLIC POLICY (Vol. 23, 2011). It is available online at:
http://www.secondamendmentinfo.com/Journal/index.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The brief filed by professional academic historians in the Washington DC vs Heller case contained an amazing number of historical errors and extensive omissions of essential information. These errors and omissions have been documented at ON SECOND OPINION BLOG in  a 24 part series, Root Causes of Never-Ending Second Amendment Dispute, which commenced on January 25, 2009.</p>
<p>The most recent Second Amendment article directly contradicting the academic historians is The American Revolutionary Era Origin of the Second Amendment&#8217;s Clauses, which was published in the JOURNAL ON FIREARMS &amp; PUBLIC POLICY (Vol. 23, 2011). It is available online at:<br />
<a href="http://www.secondamendmentinfo.com/Journal/index.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.secondamendmentinfo.com/Journal/index.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

